Quote:
Originally Posted by shamus
What! Your one's don't speak to you!!!
My thoughts are that there are things that I would like such as the ability to wrap their arms and legs around you at night without five minutes of careful positioning.
I don't however want someone elses idea of what my girls should say imposed on me. I personally can't think of anything more of a turn off than a doll telling me to f*ck it. When we have girls that interact in the same way as Joi (Bladerunner 2049) then the game changes but for now with dolls that move like animatronics and have been programmed for teenagers, I would rather continue as is.
The issue there of course is that if everyone waits until the girls are available that they want to buy then the manufacturers will lose interest in the R&D.
|
It's when you get to the level of the "Hosts" in Westworld the game really changes. Anatomically correct - even down to synthetic muscles and bone - but still an AI creation controlled by a computer program. This a level that I could see in the future for dolls a century or so from now. The only problem is you'd need to make sure that they follow Asimov's law on robotics:
1: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2:A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
I other words if a robot think it's own existence is threatened it only takes a glitch to act in possible self preservation and kill or harm a human making rule 3 a paradox.
The other option is a female version of Data from Star Trek. Data himself told Tasha Yar he was well versed in multiple love making techniques.