Maybe yes maybe no (It's a No !)

[shamus]

Originally Posted by jock001

au contraire - I read it all, and am filled with admiration at your grasp, and at your common-sense summing-up. But I thought you were just a simple bean-counter?

But then I take my glasses off and they realise that I was Superman all along, lol.

Originally Posted by Tommo10

Thanks Shamus, yup I read it.

Unfortunately, on payment we entered into an agreement and accepted the terms and conditions, part of which reads.

Contract wasn't breached by Lucid

So, it was not worth pursuing it.

Tommo

Were you able to read the contract before entering into it. If not its invalid.

Best example of that is multi storey car parks. If the sign that says that damage to property is at the owners risk but is only visible once you are through the barrier then its not worth the poster its printed on. You must know terms or alteration to terms before the contract is entered into for them to be binding.

If you were presented with the terms before the contract was entered into then its all legit.

Anyway, one gold star for Tommo for reading it.

Originally Posted by PDutus

I read it all!

And one gold star to PD for reading it as well

[algaeholics]

Originally Posted by Tommo10

If the T&C are incompatible with consumer law, then they are not enforceable.

I believe the key here is who is at fault and the phrase 'for any reason'.

[Lucidtoys]

I am off on holiday with the family. Business runs as usual.

Will return to the forum once I am back.

Regards