UK Love Doll Forums  
Untitled Document

Go Back   UK Love Doll Forums > Chinese Doll Forum. > WM Doll Forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2019, 04:06 PM
CloudWatching's Avatar
CloudWatching CloudWatching is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: England
Posts: 235
Default 168E old vs new

Ive been browsing again (never really stopped over the last several years!) at options for another doll, with lots of back and forth about what size and proportions etc etc

Based on a few ive seen and like the look of and finding out their proportions, I narrowed it down to roughly the following

Height >163
Bust: 90 - 100 (thanks to some of incred's pics.. the cleavage on some of his girls )
Waist: >60
Hips: 90 - 98 ish

I pulled all the measurements Shamus had kindly prepared in his jinsan bodies thread and put them into a spreadsheet to filter on dolls that fall within those ranges and it looked like the 168E I think is the best fit. I did this a few times by focusing first on maybe just the waist, but didnt like the hips or tits being too narrow\big, so next time I filtered on one or the other, but the 168E seemed to be the one that kept cropping up

And in the promotional pictures she does look amazing



But while reading up on her here and on TDF I found that a lot of these pictures are apparently of an older version, and the newer one has slimmer hips which im not so sure about, this isnt the picture I was trying to find but hope it shows well enough, another I found but have no idea where was more front on and it was clearer the hips were relatively narrow for her size, but the picture below will have to do



Does anybody (tommo ) have both of these older and newer versions, and is there actually much difference between them in person?

Thanks all
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2019, 04:32 PM
Tommo10's Avatar
Tommo10 Tommo10 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CloudWatching View Post
Ive been browsing again (never really stopped over the last several years!) at options for another doll, with lots of back and forth about what size and proportions etc etc

Based on a few ive seen and like the look of and finding out their proportions, I narrowed it down to roughly the following

Height >163
Bust: 90 - 100 (thanks to some of incred's pics.. the cleavage on some of his girls )
Waist: >60
Hips: 90 - 98 ish

I pulled all the measurements Shamus had kindly prepared in his jinsan bodies thread and put them into a spreadsheet to filter on dolls that fall within those ranges and it looked like the 168E I think is the best fit. I did this a few times by focusing first on maybe just the waist, but didnt like the hips or tits being too narrow\big, so next time I filtered on one or the other, but the 168E seemed to be the one that kept cropping up

And in the promotional pictures she does look amazing



But while reading up on her here and on TDF I found that a lot of these pictures are apparently of an older version, and the newer one has slimmer hips which im not so sure about, this isnt the picture I was trying to find but hope it shows well enough, another I found but have no idea where was more front on and it was clearer the hips were relatively narrow for her size, but the picture below will have to do



Does anybody (tommo ) have both of these older and newer versions, and is there actually much difference between them in person?

Thanks all
I have the older version, but not the new
I can take photos tonight of her and post them in the Jinsan body thread if you want.
__________________



Last edited by Tommo10; 05-07-2019 at 08:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2019, 04:46 PM
CloudWatching's Avatar
CloudWatching CloudWatching is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: England
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommo10 View Post
I have the older version, but not the new
I can take photos tonight of her and post them in the Jinsan body thread if you want.
Thanks Tommo but no need, I think I have seen enough pictures, but as they can be misleading I was hoping somebody who does have both would be able to share their thoughts on how different they are in person, as it may be that in person the differences arent really that noticeable
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2019, 09:33 PM
Tommo10's Avatar
Tommo10 Tommo10 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,574
Default

have you looked at the YL 170 D because she's a little less chesty but a bit more in arse and leg department
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2019, 09:42 AM
CloudWatching's Avatar
CloudWatching CloudWatching is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: England
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommo10 View Post
have you looked at the YL 170 D because she's a little less chesty but a bit more in arse and leg department
Cheers Tommo, Ive had a look and yes it does look a very good option. Do you have one by any chance? A picture of the WM168E and YL170D next to each other would be good to see. You might have been lucky to get your 168 when you did!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2019, 09:55 AM
Tommo10's Avatar
Tommo10 Tommo10 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,574
Default

Yes I do have both and will take some pictures this morning, I was intending going out with a few in the sun but it is throwing it down here so my plans have now changed. I have them both here so I will just have some breakfast and do a few photos, until then this is the only one I have saved on my phone.



Tommo
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2019, 10:18 AM
CloudWatching's Avatar
CloudWatching CloudWatching is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: England
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommo10 View Post
Yes I do have both and will take some pictures this morning, I was intending going out with a few in the sun but it is throwing it down here so my plans have now changed. I have them both here so I will just have some breakfast and do a few photos, until then this is the only one I have saved on my phone.



Tommo
Brilliant thanks, from that angle at least I like the look of the girl on the right though both would be more than welcome But I cant tell which one is which?

And thats a shame we wont get to see the original plan, theres always a little something extra thats added to an outdoor shoot
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2019, 10:21 AM
Tommo10's Avatar
Tommo10 Tommo10 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,574
Default

Left WM168E Right YL170D
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2019, 10:28 AM
Matt gloss's Avatar
Matt gloss Matt gloss is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: The Fylde peninsular
Posts: 717
Default

mmmm breakfast...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2019, 10:30 AM
Hinata Hinata is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 117
Default

The new 168E is not a too slim waist TPE doll. Thet are quite natural... A kind of TPE Teddy Babe.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
168, 168e, hips, wm168, wm168e

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.