UK Love Doll Forums  
Untitled Document

Go Back   UK Love Doll Forums > Chinese Doll Forum. > WM Doll Forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2021, 03:33 PM
ChittyBA ChittyBA is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 194
Default Torn between a 168E and 166C

Hi all. I am considering buying a third doll and am torn between the two.

The main issue is weight. I have bought a doll hanging stand in order to be able to make dressing and cleaning easier. However, trying to lift my 162E up and onto the suspension hook has resulted in many gratuitous swear words as her big ass keeps bouncing off it.

The second issue is tied to the first and that is dimensions and measurements. I want to really buy a doll with a realistic body and the 168E seems to have that at 36-24-35. The weight is big at 40kg but with the weight reduction option she should be a lot lighter. The boobs are the size that I like but not sure about the ass being too big.

The 166C is a very popular doll and many photo’s by other members show her in a sexy light. However, I feel she may be too thin for me regards to measurements such as a 20 inch waist. Her weight is lighter though and her overall shape is appealing although her legs seem very thin to me. The arch between her ass and shoulders does not seem extreme either.

Any advice is appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2021, 04:43 PM
PDutus's Avatar
PDutus PDutus is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Channel Islands
Posts: 3,366
Default

Hi

I've been following developments in weight reduction closely recently (you will probably recall that my Miranda Louise is a reduced-weight JY).

It is very likely that the trade off with the reduced weight 168E will be increased firmness, so bear that in mind when comparing her with a standard 166C. I use the term "full fat" for the non weight-reduced dolls, but I don't think that sits well with a WM166C!

Also, with JY at least and the same might well apply to WM, gel breasts are not available with weight reduction, only hollow or solid.

At the end of the day, it depends what the doll will be used for. If a cuddle buddy/sex doll, my advice, based on experience and what I have learned, is don't go for weight reduction.

If primarily for photography, go weight reduction.

Hope that helps
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-04-2021, 05:48 PM
Tommo10's Avatar
Tommo10 Tommo10 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Tommo's Tardis
Posts: 6,654
Default

I have all three of those dolls, my 168E is the original body though, they changed it slightly and over the last few years the weight's may have increased then by a couple of kg, the one I have is just over 38kg with hollow breasts, old standard skeleton, and maybe a new version will be a little more then 40kg with gel breasts and enhanced skeleton.

Now I really ain't going to be any help, because my personnel favourite for body shape v's weight, is the WM162E which you already have got, and if I had to choose it would be that one, although I do like taller dolls. My opinion of the other two they are both sides of 162E with the extra height, if your are a breast and arse man (like me) then the 168E is the one, but if you struggle with 162E weight you will struggle with a 168E. The 166c is a lighter doll, it's ticks all the boxes for many, but I prefer the fuller body shapes with slightly larger breasts, so she would always be further down my list.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-04-2021, 02:16 AM
ChittyBA ChittyBA is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 194
Default

Thank you for the replies so far
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-04-2021, 02:20 AM
ChittyBA ChittyBA is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommo10 View Post
I have all three of those dolls, my 168E is the original body though, they changed it slightly and over the last few years the weight's may have increased then by a couple of kg, the one I have is just over 38kg with hollow breasts, old standard skeleton, and maybe a new version will be a little more then 40kg with gel breasts and enhanced skeleton.

Now I really ain't going to be any help, because my personnel favourite for body shape v's weight, is the WM162E which you already have got, and if I had to choose it would be that one, although I do like taller dolls. My opinion of the other two they are both sides of 162E with the extra height, if your are a breast and arse man (like me) then the 168E is the one, but if you struggle with 162E weight you will struggle with a 168E. The 166c is a lighter doll, it's ticks all the boxes for many, but I prefer the fuller body shapes with slightly larger breasts, so she would always be further down my list.
Hi Tommo. I have read that there was a newer version of the 168E brought out that has slightly slimmer thighs, hips and arse.

Would you say that the 168E has a “bubble butt”?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-04-2021, 03:34 AM
Tommo10's Avatar
Tommo10 Tommo10 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Tommo's Tardis
Posts: 6,654
Default

The old version was, but slightly less round and pronounced than the YL155D which has a bubble butt.

I have some photographs of her somewhere, I will try to find them, the ones I am after aren't saved under her name, so I need to look them out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-04-2021, 04:03 AM
Tommo10's Avatar
Tommo10 Tommo10 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Tommo's Tardis
Posts: 6,654
Default

Give up...
These are some online















Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-04-2021, 05:28 AM
ChittyBA ChittyBA is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 194
Default

Thank’s. Just waiting to get some confirmed info about the weight reduction option from Silicone Lovers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.