Thread: Phil wins!!!
View Single Post
  #24  
Old 10-08-2022, 06:49 AM
shroud shroud is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The-Doll-House View Post
As it happens, the case did lay out:
  • That if a dolls features are in proportion with that of a mature woman, the size/height has little do with it.
  • Facial features are difficult to define as juvenile.
  • Breast size means nothing. (As long as they are there)
But this is still a hurdle to lay flat.
Just a matter of time.
Well done phil,

regarding the womanly proportions, are they talking about waist-hip ratio? If so im thinking that even the smaller lighter dolls should be allowable under this case law provided they have waist-hip ratio of an adult female ( and visible breasts )
Reply With Quote