Hi again Ranger,
we crossed.
just checked them and I don't think that photo 11 is the same body as girl in the original link.
Look at the neck and clavical then compare to the other girl. Then compare photo 11 to the girl with head #314. I can see the link between those two and have every confidence that photo 11 is an early iteration of the WM 156C... But not the other photo shoot which as detailed in the previous post you can really see the differences in the bodies.
|