|
|
#41
06-01-2021, 07:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Comparing the original to a photo from wmdolls.com
Looks the same to me. Flat, bright lighting and pale skin tone don't help, but the same features are there in this shoot 
|
|
#42
06-01-2021, 07:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Aye right, blame the tog!
 Psion
__________________
|
|
#43
06-01-2021, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
ok, back to side by side.
Lets call them A, B and C. A is the skin tone that she would be so if B is the same body the skin tone has been adjusted... That could explain the different definition of the ribs but doesn't explain the different muscle structure in the neck. Whilst there is a question mark over those two it is possible that they are indeed both the same model. Body C though which will be the body from which the measurements were gathered is not the same body as A and B. To me she doesn't even look close to being the same proportions or detailing. I wouldn't kick any of them out of bed for eating crisps, but my feeling is that at least one of them is not the same model as the others. All the best, Shamus.
|
|
#45
06-01-2021, 08:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
To me it looks like the differences can be explained by pose, lighting, and I think C has received some image smoothing. I have seen these kind of lighting differences in both doll photography and also lunar photography - light something at an angle and you exaggerate the details, blasting it with light from the front flattens everything out and the details disappear.
I have seen other photoshoots of the 156C in natural where the detailing is nowhere near as clear. A and B are definitely WM156C in my view, back in 2017/2018 when I was searching for the doll that eventually became Leah I spent a lot of time looking at these photos.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
